BBFC Rating
The
BBFC (British Board of Film classification) is an independent organisation that
reviews and gives media products – such as films, video games and music videos
– age ratings. Our Red Hood film would be based on the comic storyline of the character
which has elements of being darker, more violent and overall has a more adult
tone than most other superhero comics and film storylines. That is because the
story explores adult themes such as revenge, morality and the criminal nature
of people extensively; in addition, the comic and animated adaptations of the
character’s stories have depicted a lot of violence as well as in some cases
the violence being graphic in nature. Overall because we have decided to incorporate
these elements into our film we have decided to rate our product as a 15.
The
BBFC has a number of criteria that they base a 15 rated film on:
15 – Suitable only
for 15 years and over
No one younger than
15 may see a 15 film in a cinema. No one younger than 15 may rent or buy a 15
rated video work.
Discrimination
The work as a whole
must not endorse discriminatory language or behaviour, although there may be
racist, homophobic or other discriminatory themes and language.
-
In
light of this, our work will not include much discriminatory language or
behaviour, but there may be some displayed by some of the criminal characters
in the film.
Drugs
Drug taking may be
shown but the work as a whole must not promote or encourage drug misuse (for
example, through instructional detail). The misuse of easily accessible and
highly dangerous substances (for example, aerosols or solvents) is unlikely to
be acceptable.
- Particularly for some of the criminal characters
parts in the film, there may be references to or drugs shown, because as the Red
Hood will encounter crime bosses, some of them may be dealing with drugs. However,
we would not be directly showing how to use the drugs.
Imitable behaviour
Dangerous behaviour
(for example, hanging, suicide and self-harming) should not dwell on detail which
could be copied. Whether the depiction of easily accessible weapons is
acceptable will depend on factors such as realism, context and setting.
- There may be be minor instances of
dangerous acts but they would not be dwelt upon. Showcasing of weapons would
only be in the context of the criminals and their environment and the scenes
with Red Hood.
Language
There may be strong
language. Very strong language may be permitted, depending on the manner in
which it is used, who is using the language, its frequency within the work as a
whole and any special contextual justification.
-
There
will not be too many instances of excessive language being used, however there
would be infrequent uses.
Nudity
There are no
constraints on nudity in a non-sexual or educational context. There may be
nudity in a sexual context but usually without strong detail.
- There would be no nudity in our film.
Sex
Sexual activity may
be portrayed, but usually without strong detail. There may be strong verbal
references to sexual behaviour, but the strongest references are unlikely to be
acceptable unless justified by context. Works whose primary purpose is sexual
arousal or stimulation are unlikely to be acceptable.
-
- There would be no sexual activity or
references to it.
Threat
There may be strong
threat and horror. A sustained focus on sadistic or sexual threat is unlikely
to be acceptable.
- There would be cases of strong threat and
horror as the narrative would include Red Hood dealing with dangerous criminals
but not too many or for too long.
Violence
Violence may be
strong but should not dwell on the infliction of pain or injury. The strongest
gory images are unlikely to be acceptable. Strong sadistic violence is also
unlikely to be acceptable. There may be detailed verbal references to sexual
violence but the depiction of sexual violence must be discreet and justified by
context.
-
There
would be a lot of violence in the film, because the narrative is about a
vigilante going after dangerous criminals. There will not be too many gory
instances and most would not be shown but implied.
No comments:
Post a Comment